West Brom’s new boss Alan Pardew will choose his first Baggies beginning XI this Saturday, having been appointed supervisor on the Hawthorns on Wednesday, and the previous Palace man will look to inject some attacking aptitude right into a inflexible aspect intent on defensive soccer.
He should be cautious of a spirited Palace staff, nevertheless, as Roy Hodgson has overseen two attracts and a win in his final three fixtures to place the Eagles inside touching distance of the remainder of pack.
It ought to be fascinating to see how Pardew units his aspect out, however a mini damage disaster means he should discover his squad depth.
The Baggies’ undisputed primary ought to retain his spot in between the sticks.
An damage disaster on the again might even see Pardew subject Allan Nyom at left-back, on account of Kieran Gibbs’ niggling hamstring complaints.
Craig Dawson’s absence via damage might even see Jonny Evans shoved out to the suitable, whereas Ahmed Hegazi and Gareth McAuley will occupy the centre half spots.
The weird full-back pairing should deliver their A-game to deal with the rampant Wilfried Zaha and Andros Townsend.
Nineteen-year-old Sam Subject ought to retain his spot within the beginning XI after scoring his first Premier League purpose towards Newcastle on Tuesday, and might be helped by the evergreen Gareth Barry alongside him.
Jake Livermore will companion Barry in the midst of the park for the Baggies, while James McClean might be tasked with taking the sport to the Palace defence together with his tireless operating.
The physicality and willingness to run of the Baggies’ strike duo might pose some points for a Palace backline that may boast only one clear sheet this season, though their vitality and dedication is scant comfort for a pair who merely don’t rating sufficient.
Their capacity to create house by operating large and pulling defences might allow considered one of Pardew’s midfielders to interrupt via and rating, however the pair themselves are unlikely to get targets themselves given their inconsistency in entrance of purpose.